1. Building Innovation Capacity


    The Talent Development team at a major engineering firm needed to create a coherent innovation curriculum across all levels of leadership in the organization. The result was the design and development of learning objectives and curriculum across five talent pools with common themes and core messages on driving organizational innovation by focusing on individuals, climate, operations and strategy.


    See full post and discussion
    Posted: 4 months ago
  2. Ancient Innovations
Reaching Back Through History to Find Creative Inspiration
By Sharon de Korte

History

A few years ago I went to the Bata Shoe Museum in Toronto. It is an
incredible museum with a fantastic collection of unusual shoes – glass slippers,
shoes of Winston Churchill, and the actual moonboots Neil Armstrong wore when he
walked on the moon.

There was a special exhibit on 15th - 17th century Venetian chopines that left a deep
impression on me. They had the most incredible platform shoes imaginable – up to
20 inches tall. Women who wore them were usually accompanied by an attendant
on whom they could balance themselves.

Today

My apartment building is having the hallways redone. Today as I arrived
home, I was surprised to see two workmen in front of my door wearing what looked
like a modern version of those Venetian shoes: 20 inch heels strapped on to their
work boots to enable them to easily walk around and plaster the ceiling.

I imagined how inconvenient it must be to do this type of work with a ladder:
climbing up and down, up and down, up and down, moving the ladder every few
moments.

In retrospect, this is an obvious solution…but it wasn’t obvious to all those people
all those years (and even now) who go up and down ladders to do the same job.
I wondered how this idea was born. Maybe the inventor thought, “how might we
more easily move the ladder,” or “how might we attach the ladder to the worker,”

or “how might we have a ladder at the end of our feet,” or “how might we create
easy-to-wear stilts?”

Regardless of their foundational questions, I can’t help thinking that the designers
had seen the very shoe exhibit that intrigued me so much. If so, those inspirational
but impractical shoes would have to be developed into something comfortable and
practical, and which didn’t require an assistant to keep the wearer from falling over.

Comparing the Venetian shoes to the modern ones, I noticed that there are lots of
straps on the workmen’s stilts, keeping them stable and secure. There is an essential
extra support that ties the stilts just below the knee. They also have a network of
springs, which not only make them comfortable to walk in, but also provide the
workmen a lot more flexibility, as they are able to bend a lot more easily.

I must admit, I wouldn’t mind a pair just for changing the occasional light bulb and
smoke detector batteries.

What problems are you working on now, that might find inspiration in history?

    Ancient Innovations

    Reaching Back Through History to Find Creative Inspiration

    By Sharon de Korte


    History

    A few years ago I went to the Bata Shoe Museum in Toronto. It is an incredible museum with a fantastic collection of unusual shoes – glass slippers, shoes of Winston Churchill, and the actual moonboots Neil Armstrong wore when he walked on the moon.


    There was a special exhibit on 15th - 17th century Venetian chopines that left a deep impression on me. They had the most incredible platform shoes imaginable – up to 20 inches tall. Women who wore them were usually accompanied by an attendant on whom they could balance themselves.


    Today


    My apartment building is having the hallways redone. Today as I arrived home, I was surprised to see two workmen in front of my door wearing what looked like a modern version of those Venetian shoes: 20 inch heels strapped on to their work boots to enable them to easily walk around and plaster the ceiling.


    I imagined how inconvenient it must be to do this type of work with a ladder: climbing up and down, up and down, up and down, moving the ladder every few moments.


    In retrospect, this is an obvious solution…but it wasn’t obvious to all those people all those years (and even now) who go up and down ladders to do the same job. I wondered how this idea was born. Maybe the inventor thought, “how might we more easily move the ladder,” or “how might we attach the ladder to the worker,”


    or “how might we have a ladder at the end of our feet,” or “how might we create easy-to-wear stilts?”


    Regardless of their foundational questions, I can’t help thinking that the designers had seen the very shoe exhibit that intrigued me so much. If so, those inspirational but impractical shoes would have to be developed into something comfortable and practical, and which didn’t require an assistant to keep the wearer from falling over.


    Comparing the Venetian shoes to the modern ones, I noticed that there are lots of straps on the workmen’s stilts, keeping them stable and secure. There is an essential extra support that ties the stilts just below the knee. They also have a network of springs, which not only make them comfortable to walk in, but also provide the workmen a lot more flexibility, as they are able to bend a lot more easily.


    I must admit, I wouldn’t mind a pair just for changing the occasional light bulb and smoke detector batteries.


    What problems are you working on now, that might find inspiration in history?



    See full post and discussion
    Posted: 6 months ago
  3. Point of Departure
By Amy Frazier
Italian translation ringraziamenti a Remo Nuzzolese.

Embarking on the act of creating something is like launching ourselves on a journey. Though the route begins at our point of departure, too often our imagination is focused on what we’ll do when we arrive – the sights we’ll see, the marvels we’ll experience – and not on the path which can take us there.

Years ago, when traveling in Italy, I learned a valuable lesson about the importance of clarifying the path.

My travel companion (read: husband-at-the-time) and I had quit our jobs to dedicate four months of our newly married life to the highways and byways of his ancestral paese. He was the anthropological guide, I the cultural attaché. He gravitated toward the ruins, ancient coins and familial table. I led us to the museums, restaurants, and – importantly – to the wine. We were on a backpacker’s budget, so the choice of all of the above had to be strategically considered and meticulously planned. Guided by a slim paperback on Italian food and wine, I readied recommendations as we arrived in each regional capital.

On the day in question, we were in Piedmont in search of its good wines, exemplars of which could be found in and about the town of Canelli, home of Moscato d’Asti and one of the premiere wine-producing communities in the world.

We had planned to take a locale train to Alba, and from there board a bus to Canelli. The train pulled in and we piled out. Husband-at-the-time trotted over to one of the waiting busses, spoke quickly to the driver up on his perch, and then waved me to hurry. The bus was leaving right then.

The urgency seemed inconsistent with my carefully planned itinerary, but I hurried on board. The bus pulled away. The driver turned to us over his shoulder and affirmed: “Stiamo andando a Canale…”

Only the very slightest shift in vowels caught my attention. Did he say “Can-ei-lee?” or did he say “Can-ah-ley?” “Aspetta!” I said. “Wait! — Canelli?” “Ma no,” he said. “Canale!” “Ferma!” I called out. Stop! We’d jumped on the wrong bus.

Canelli and Canale. So close, yet the distinction meant everything. The towns were less than 25 miles apart – still, to have arrived at unremarkable Canale in the search for noteworthy Canelli would have been a disappointing waste of resources, and an unnecessary loss of experience.

I think about this near-miss sometimes when I find myself impatient to move forward with a creative project and suspect that I’m forcing the process. I also think about it when I hear people describe a point in the future as the moment when they will engage their creative thinking — when the time is ripe to “toss around ideas,” for example, much the way that husband-at-the-time and I looked forward to tossing back a few glasses of Canelli’s effervescent varietals.

What makes us think that creativity, and its cousin curiosity, aren’t at least as important when we are boarding the bus as they will be when we arrive?

In fact, with applied creativity and innovation processes, choosing which bus to board is the first major phase of work. It’s a highly creative space and demands attention, inquisitiveness, and clarity. In fact, it sometimes goes under the name of “clarification.” If we don’t do a good job clarifying, we may find ourselves miles down the road, in a town that sounds kind of like where we thought we were headed, but where the returns aren’t nearly as gratifying. Often such near misses (in contrast to the really major failures of navigation, such as ending up in neighboring Austria, for example), are simply papered over, the losses quietly and cynically chalked up to failed ideation efforts, or “bad brainstorming.” But if you didn’t know where you were going when you set out, or which bus you jumped on to get there, is it any wonder your discoveries may disappoint?

On the other hand, taking the time upfront to bring creative thinking to the clarification part of the process can benefit you immeasurably down the road. It’s more time intensive at the beginning, but, much like the efforts which go into producing good wine, it’s worth it: ideas are better vetted to successfully find their home in the world, with less confusion and strain. Their worth has been made clear.

So the next time you’re tempted to save the creative thinking for a later stage in the process, consider this: “Lu vino buono se venne senza frasca.” Good wine can be sold without needing to advertise.

    Point of Departure

    By Amy Frazier

    Italian translation ringraziamenti a Remo Nuzzolese.


    Embarking on the act of creating something is like launching ourselves on a journey. Though the route begins at our point of departure, too often our imagination is focused on what we’ll do when we arrive – the sights we’ll see, the marvels we’ll experience – and not on the path which can take us there.


    Years ago, when traveling in Italy, I learned a valuable lesson about the importance of clarifying the path.


    My travel companion (read: husband-at-the-time) and I had quit our jobs to dedicate four months of our newly married life to the highways and byways of his ancestral paese. He was the anthropological guide, I the cultural attaché. He gravitated toward the ruins, ancient coins and familial table. I led us to the museums, restaurants, and – importantly – to the wine. We were on a backpacker’s budget, so the choice of all of the above had to be strategically considered and meticulously planned. Guided by a slim paperback on Italian food and wine, I readied recommendations as we arrived in each regional capital.


    On the day in question, we were in Piedmont in search of its good wines, exemplars of which could be found in and about the town of Canelli, home of Moscato d’Asti and one of the premiere wine-producing communities in the world.


    We had planned to take a locale train to Alba, and from there board a bus to Canelli. The train pulled in and we piled out. Husband-at-the-time trotted over to one of the waiting busses, spoke quickly to the driver up on his perch, and then waved me to hurry. The bus was leaving right then.


    The urgency seemed inconsistent with my carefully planned itinerary, but I hurried on board. The bus pulled away. The driver turned to us over his shoulder and affirmed: “Stiamo andando a Canale…”


    Only the very slightest shift in vowels caught my attention. Did he say “Can-ei-lee?” or did he say “Can-ah-ley?” “Aspetta!” I said. “Wait! — Canelli?” “Ma no,” he said. “Canale!” “Ferma!” I called out. Stop! We’d jumped on the wrong bus.


    Canelli and Canale. So close, yet the distinction meant everything. The towns were less than 25 miles apart – still, to have arrived at unremarkable Canale in the search for noteworthy Canelli would have been a disappointing waste of resources, and an unnecessary loss of experience.


    I think about this near-miss sometimes when I find myself impatient to move forward with a creative project and suspect that I’m forcing the process. I also think about it when I hear people describe a point in the future as the moment when they will engage their creative thinking — when the time is ripe to “toss around ideas,” for example, much the way that husband-at-the-time and I looked forward to tossing back a few glasses of Canelli’s effervescent varietals.


    What makes us think that creativity, and its cousin curiosity, aren’t at least as important when we are boarding the bus as they will be when we arrive?


    In fact, with applied creativity and innovation processes, choosing which bus to board is the first major phase of work. It’s a highly creative space and demands attention, inquisitiveness, and clarity. In fact, it sometimes goes under the name of “clarification.” If we don’t do a good job clarifying, we may find ourselves miles down the road, in a town that sounds kind of like where we thought we were headed, but where the returns aren’t nearly as gratifying. Often such near misses (in contrast to the really major failures of navigation, such as ending up in neighboring Austria, for example), are simply papered over, the losses quietly and cynically chalked up to failed ideation efforts, or “bad brainstorming.” But if you didn’t know where you were going when you set out, or which bus you jumped on to get there, is it any wonder your discoveries may disappoint?


    On the other hand, taking the time upfront to bring creative thinking to the clarification part of the process can benefit you immeasurably down the road. It’s more time intensive at the beginning, but, much like the efforts which go into producing good wine, it’s worth it: ideas are better vetted to successfully find their home in the world, with less confusion and strain. Their worth has been made clear.


    So the next time you’re tempted to save the creative thinking for a later stage in the process, consider this: “Lu vino buono se venne senza frasca.” Good wine can be sold without needing to advertise.


    See full post and discussion
    Posted: 7 months ago
  4. How to free up time to innovate using the meeting audit!


    By Russ Schoen


    “If you had to identify, in one word, the reason why the human race has not achieved, and never will achieve, its full potential, that word would be ‘meetings’.”


    – Dave Barry, “Things That It Took Me 50 Years to Learn”


    What is one of the most common barriers to innovation?


    During most innovation workshops that I facilitate, at some point I’ll ask the group, what are the barriers to innovating here?


    One of the most common answers given is “we don’t have enough time to innovate.”


    When I follow up with the question, well what is one of most unproductive uses of your time in this organization? The most common answer is – yup, You guessed it. Meetings.


    Think about your own work life for a moment. Think about the last five meetings you attended at work. Would you say they were engaging? productive? A good use of your time and your fellow colleagues’ time?


    Chances are, you answered that at least one in three of those meetings was a complete waste of your time. If so, don’t fret you are not alone.


    Did you know?


    In surveys conducted — in the US alone - where approximately 11,000,000 meetings are held every week as many as 25–50% of those meetings are characterized by those attending them as a waste of time.*


    Not only that. Here’s one more bit of bad meeting news. An MIT Sloan Management study showed that the more time employees spend in unproductive meetings, the more dissatisfied they are with their work and more likely they are to quit their jobs. Ouch.


    (*source: MIT Sloan Management: The Science and Fiction of Meetings: Winter 2007)


    So if you really want to free up some time to innovate, one of the best ways to do so is to clear out some space to innovate. And one of the quickest ways to do that is a meeting audit!


    What is a Meeting Audit and how do I conduct one?


    The purpose of a meeting audit is to identify meetings that you can stop holding (or attending) or that you can shorten which will free up time. A deliberate meeting audit takes about 30 minutes with a team and many teams find that they can cut about 20% of the total meetings they hold or attend on a monthly basis.


    To conduct a meeting audit, gather your team (and you can do this alone if you work independently)


    1. Create a list of all the meetings you and your team hold or attend on a regular basis (we recommend on a flipchart or white board)
    2. Review the list with the whole team and ask, which of these meetings could we stop holding? Which ones really are not that productive? Which ones can be shortened or altered? Which ones do we really need to attend and which ones can we stop attending?
    3. Physically, cross out the meetings that the group would like to stop holding or attending.
    4. Add up the time that will be freed up for your team if you stopped holding those meetings.
    5. Commit to using that time towards innovation efforts.

    Got concerns?


    Now you may be thinking, there is no way that we can stop holding that monthly x meeting! People will flip. It’s too important. Well one suggestion is not to kill the meeting all together – take a break from holding or attending meeting for a month and see if people really miss it. If they do, you can always reinstate it (and hopefully make some changes to make it more productive). If its not missed it, then you can officially kill it!


    Time to Innovate: Next Step


    So if you want to innovate and you think you don’t have enough time, why not conduct a meeting audit? You’ll deliberately clear out some much needed space and time from your schedule and overcome one of the most frequently cited barriers to innovation!


    See full post and discussion
    Posted: 8 months ago
  5. 4 Opportunities for Innovation


    By Stavros Michailidis


    A short while ago, we conducted an informal survey of business leaders to explore how they perceived creativity, innovation and problem solving. We found that:


    • Problem Solving is something they, and the rest of their organization, are very familiar with and do continually.
    • Innovation is something that is paradigm shifting. It is desired but rare.
    • Creativity is less tangible. They realized it is required but are uncertain on how to account for it.

    Considering these common perceptions, let us look at a simple framework for turning problem solving into innovation utilizing a little bit of creativity.


    Traditional problem solving has 4 phases or steps.


    • Clarifying – Understanding the essence of the problem.
    • Solving – Searching for and identifying a solution.
    • Planning – Determining the steps necessary to implement the solution.
    • Executing – Implementing the plan.

    The above steps tend to work perfectly for many problems, especially the ones that don’t require a very innovative solution. However, if you need to work on a problem that would benefit from a little creativity and imagination, try capitalizing on the four opportunities for innovation (one for each problem solving step).


    Reframe the Problem


    Instead of simply clarifying the situation, find new ways to interpret the issue. Seek unique perspectives from those who don’t embrace the common understanding of the problem.


    Originate New Ideas


    Stop looking for the right answer and start looking for lots of interesting options. Think about it - If you find the most obvious and straightforward answer you are pretty much guaranteed to get the most common results. If you are really after innovation you must look for a different type of solution.


    Enhance the Plan

    Two companies can pursue essentially the same idea, with vastly different approaches (…think Encarta vs. Wikipedia). Innovation isn’t just about what we’re doing, it’s also about how we do things. New approaches generate new types of results and new opportunities.


    Improvise During Implementation


    Planning is a valuable process, but we must remain open to change as we execute the plan. Along the way we will face unforeseen obstacles and gain new insights. Remain flexible and adaptive during implementation. Be open to stumbling upon new value by continuously learning from the implementation processes’ successes and failures.


    Using some tried and tested tools and techniques individuals and groups can capitalize on these four opportunities for innovation.


    Use the comments to tell us about your success innovating around the 4 opportunities or which opportunity most interests you and we’ll share the respective tools you need to get creative.


    See full post and discussion
    Posted: 9 months ago